Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

Show Gist options
  • Select an option

  • Save TravnikovDev/3f7e6147fb1d9a666a30efd05c77319f to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Select an option

Save TravnikovDev/3f7e6147fb1d9a666a30efd05c77319f to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
LinkedIn Post - 2025-12-05 08:19

Good News No One Talks About (as usual)

I saw a viral claim that the Aral Sea “rose by 42%” and my skeptic mode kicked in. I asked my research bot to dig in Kazakh first, then Russian and English. The punchline: it’s not the water level that jumped 42%, it’s the water volume in the North Aral Sea - the Kazakh part - now around 27 billion cubic meters. Big deal anyway. Salinity dropped almost fourfold. Fish came back. The map looks less like a scar.

Here’s the part that surprised me: this “miracle” is mostly plumbing. The Kok-Aral Dam acts like a smart plug that keeps the Syr Darya’s water in the northern bowl long enough to build volume and dilute salt. Not flashy. Just gates, timing, and a river.

And it took logistics, not slogans. In 2024, Kazakhstan pushed a record 2.6 billion cubic meters into the North Aral, dredged channels, and tuned seasonal operations. Cross-border coordination mattered too. Some years bring more snowmelt, some less - you ride the flow you get.

Where this works: the North Aral. You can see it in numbers and nets - roughly 8,000 tons of fish and over 20 species reported. This is a policy win you can measure, not a press release.

Where it fails or gets risky: the South Aral, mostly in Uzbekistan, is still in crisis. Also, one dry year or a tough upstream decision on hydropower or irrigation can knock the gains back. And yes, that “42% level” headline is misleading. I wouldn’t use it. Say volume or don’t post it.

Would I trust it today? Yes - for the North Aral, with caveats. I trust dashboards: monthly inflows, salinity, target elevations, dam operations. If Phase II upgrades stall or neighbors change priorities, this gets fragile fast.

This changed how I judge environmental comebacks. Real miracles look like spreadsheets and sluice gates, not TED talks. It’s a bucket brigade, not a silver bullet 💧🐟

My filter now: if a project can’t show water volume, salinity trend, and a credible plan for keeping flows steady through dry years, it’s PR, not recovery. What other “boring miracles” are we ignoring?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment