This document articulates foundational principles derived through reflection, testing, and revision over time. It is not a creed to be accepted on faith but a framework that earns its legitimacy through coherence, explanatory power, and alignment with observed outcomes.
The underlying method is a form of reflective equilibrium — moving between intuitions, principles, and outcomes until they cohere — combined with indirect consequentialism, which holds that outcomes matter but are best served by following well-grounded principles rather than case-by-case calculation. Principles here are not axioms but empirical generalizations: patterns robust enough across history and cases that they function as strong defaults, revisable only with overwhelming evidence.
