113 non-skipped runs from 2026-02-19 to 2026-03-11.
| Date | Who | Result | Issue | Title | Run |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-11 | rafiss | success | #163431 | roachtest: ruby-pg failed [liveness session expired before transaction] | run |
| 2026-03-10 | williamchoe3 | success | #165212 | pkg/sql/opt/opbench/opbench_test_/opbench_test: pkg failed | run |
| 2026-03-10 | dt | success | #164906 | roachtest: backup-restore/online-restore failed | run |
| 2026-03-10 | dt | success | #165013 | backup: TestBackupRestoreCrossTab |
Single-node CockroachDB (n2-standard-16, 64GB RAM) running a KV workload at
~20% CPU with GOGC=off and GOMEMLIMIT=51GiB. The live heap is ~480MB, but
with GOGC disabled, the heap grows to ~50GB before GC triggers (driven entirely
by the memory limit). GC runs roughly every 24 seconds.
Single-node CockroachDB (n2-standard-16), KV workload at ~20-25% CPU. GODEBUG=gctrace=1,gcpacertrace=1.
pacer: assist ratio=+1.966144e+000 (scan 226 MB in 1660->1736 MB) workers=4++0.000000e+000
pacer: 27% CPU (25 exp.) for 151835216+1501680+2831530 B work (155682658 B exp.) in 1741434408 B -> 1766226960 B (∆goal -54389166, cons/mark +1.702709e-001)
gc 20311 @11135.890s 0%: 0.099+11+0.098 ms clock, 1.5+5.1/45/49+1.5 ms cpu, 1660->1684->434 MB, 1736 MB goal, 1 MB stacks, 2 MB globals, 16 P
pacer: sweep done at heap size 458MB; allocated 23MB during sweep; swept 218348 pages at +1.681737e-004 pages/byte
The Datadog cockroachdb.sys.gc.assist.ns metric (and likely all Prometheus
counter-type metrics) reports a rate ~3x higher than the actual rate when using
.as_rate(). The root cause appears to be a mismatch between the OTel
Prometheus scrape interval (30s) and the interval metadata submitted to Datadog
by the OTel Datadog exporter (suspected 10s, matching the batch processor
timeout).
Author: wenyihu6 | Branch: oldmodel2 | Epic: CRDB-55052
[correctness] highDiskSpaceUtilization comment is now stale (capacity_model.go:703-724): The comment explains that fractionUsed = load/capacity = LogicalBytes / (LogicalBytes / diskUtil) = diskUtil. Under the new model, load=Used, capacity=Used+Available — the math still recovers actual disk utilization, but the comment references the old LogicalBytes-based derivation and is now misleading.
[correctness] minCapacity floor is dramatically lower than the old floor (physical_model.go): The old model had cpuCapacityFloorPerStore = 0.1 * 1e9 (0.1 cores). The new minCapacity = 1.0 means 1 ns/s — effectively zero CPU capacity. The old floor existed to prevent utilization from going to infinity on overloaded nodes (its comment explains this in detail). If a store has non-zero load and capacity=1 ns/s, utilization
This PR replaces two uses of kvstorage.TODOReadWriter(b.batch) in
replicaAppBatch.runPostAddTriggersReplicaOnly with a new
b.ReadWriter() helper that correctly separates the state engine batch
(b.batch) from the raft engine batch (b.RaftBatch()). This is part of the
broader effort to logically separate the state and raft engines in the apply
stack (issue #161059). The change is correct, small, and follows the pattern
This PR implements the KV portion of SKIP LOCKED support for
SELECT ... FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED and SELECT ... FOR SHARE SKIP LOCKED.
The change spans the MVCC scanner, KV concurrency control, optimistic
evaluation, timestamp cache, refresh spans, and the lock table. The SQL
optimizer still rejects SKIP LOCKED (the SQL portion was extracted into
a separate PR, #83627), so this is plumbing-only from the KV side.
This PR adds a roachtest that exercises changefeeds during rolling node
drain+restart cycles and introduces a COCKROACH_CHANGEFEED_TESTING_SLOW_RETRY
env var for reaching max backoff behavior quickly. The test is well-structured
and the motivation is clear. There are a few structural and correctness issues
worth addressing.
This PR introduces a physical capacity model for MMA that expresses store loads and capacities in physical resource units (CPU ns/s, disk bytes) and threads amplification factors through all range-load callsites. It is a well-structured, well-documented change with excellent commit messages. The core algebraic claim (load/capacity ratio preservation) is correct. There are a few issues worth addressing, the most important being a missing capacity floor that changes