(by @andrestaltz)
If you prefer to watch video tutorials with live-coding, then check out this series I recorded with the same contents as in this article: Egghead.io - Introduction to Reactive Programming.
| # added to .git-hooks/pre_commit/debugger.rb | |
| module Overcommit::Hook::PreCommit | |
| # Check for Debugger | |
| class Debugger < Base | |
| def run | |
| keywords = config['keywords'] | |
| result = execute(command, args: [keywords.join('|')] + applicable_files) | |
| unless result.stdout.empty? | |
| extract_messages( |
| require "active_record" | |
| ActiveRecord::Base.establish_connection(adapter: "sqlite3", database: ":memory:") | |
| ActiveRecord::Migration.class_eval do | |
| create_table(:records) do |t| | |
| t.string :column | |
| end | |
| end | |
| data = 50_000.times.map { |i| Hash[column: "Column #{i}"] } |
| #!/usr/bin/env ruby | |
| # Validates that you don't commit forbidden keywords to the repo | |
| # You can skip this checking with 'git commit --no-verify' | |
| exit 0 if ARGV.include?('--no-verify') | |
| # Update this list with your own forbidden keywords | |
| KEYWORDS = %w(binding.pry console.log debugger) | |
| def red(text) "\033[31m#{text}\033[0m"; end |
| /* | |
| ******************************************************************************** | |
| Golang - Asterisk and Ampersand Cheatsheet | |
| ******************************************************************************** | |
| Also available at: https://play.golang.org/p/lNpnS9j1ma | |
| Allowed: | |
| -------- | |
| p := Person{"Steve", 28} stores the value |
(by @andrestaltz)
If you prefer to watch video tutorials with live-coding, then check out this series I recorded with the same contents as in this article: Egghead.io - Introduction to Reactive Programming.
I wrote this a long time ago as a proof-of-concept for a vaporware project. Recently I have had the need to something which seems easy at a high-level standpoint, but is actually quite hard to implement.
The original purpose for this concept was to easily maintain a strict order of data held within the rows, while still having the option to reorder the rows in an efficient manner (one table, no joins, no special embedded scripts etc).
A little insight into what I was doing: I once worked on a network security team for a tier-1 ISP. A coworker and myself had already written some really nice code to deal with the thousands (yes, thousands) of firewalls we dealt with on a daily basis. We created an API which generated abstracted structures of firewall configurations; by abstracting I mean creating a singular data-structure which represented rules, and rule-sets (a nice side-effect of this method was we could morph one firewall syntax structure to another. E.g., juniper filters -> netscreen rules. Needless to s