Table of Contents generated with DocToc
Some important software design patterns in Java include:
-
Singleton pattern: This pattern ensures that a class has only one instance and provides a global access point to it.
-
Factory pattern: This pattern provides a way to create objects without specifying the exact class of object that will be created.
-
Observer pattern: This pattern allows objects to be notified of changes to other objects, without the objects being tightly coupled.
-
Decorator pattern: This pattern allows behavior to be added to an individual object, either statically or dynamically, without affecting the behavior of other objects from the same class.
-
Template method pattern: This pattern defines the skeleton of an algorithm in a method, allowing subclasses to fill in the details.
-
Command pattern: This pattern encapsulates a request as an object, separating the command from the object that executes it.
-
Iterator pattern: This pattern provides a way to access the elements of an aggregate object sequentially without exposing its underlying representation.
-
State pattern: This pattern allows an object to change its behavior depending on its internal state.
-
Strategy pattern: This pattern allows an algorithm's behavior to be selected at runtime.
These are just a few examples of design patterns that are commonly used in Java. There are many others as well, each with its own specific use cases and advantages.
The Singleton pattern is a design pattern that ensures that a class has only one instance, while providing a global access point to that instance. The singleton pattern can be implemented in a variety of ways in Java, but the most common approach is to make the constructor of the class private and to provide a static method that returns the instance of the class.
Here's an example of how the singleton pattern can be implemented in Java:
public class Singleton {
private static Singleton instance;
private Singleton() {}
public static Singleton getInstance() {
if (instance == null) {
instance = new Singleton();
}
return instance;
}
// Other methods
}The getInstance() method returns the singleton instance of the class. If the instance does not exist, it creates one. If it already exists, it returns the existing instance.
Singleton pattern has some advantages, such as:
- It ensures that only one instance of a class is created in the entire application
- It provides a global point of access to that instance
- It can be used to control concurrent access to shared resources
- It can be used to implement singleton behavior across the application
However, it also has some disadvantages, such as:
- It can make the code difficult to test
- It can make the code difficult to refactor
- It can make the code less flexible
- It can make the code harder to understand
It is important to use the singleton pattern judiciously, as overuse of the pattern can lead to tightly coupled and hard-to-maintain code.
The Factory pattern is a design pattern that provides a way to create objects without specifying the exact class of object that will be created. Instead of calling a constructor directly, the factory method is called, which returns an object of the desired class.
The factory pattern has two main components: a factory interface and one or more factory implementations. The factory interface defines a method for creating objects, while the factory implementations provide the actual logic for creating the objects.
Here's an example of how the factory pattern can be implemented in Java:
interface ShapeFactory {
Shape createShape();
}
class CircleFactory implements ShapeFactory {
@Override
public Shape createShape() {
return new Circle();
}
}
class SquareFactory implements ShapeFactory {
@Override
public Shape createShape() {
return new Square();
}
}In this example, the ShapeFactory interface defines a method for creating Shape objects, while the CircleFactory and SquareFactory classes provide the actual logic for creating Circle and Square objects, respectively. The factory pattern allows a client to create objects without having to specify the class of object that will be created.
The Factory pattern has several benefits, such as:
- It promotes loose coupling by separating the process of creating objects from the classes that use them.
- It allows for the creation of objects without specifying the exact class of object that will be created.
- It provides a way to encapsulate the process of creating objects, making it easier to change the way objects are created.
- It can be used to create objects of a specific type based on input data.
However, it also has some disadvantages, such as:
- It can make the code more complex and harder to understand.
- It can make the code more difficult to test.
- It can lead to a large number of small classes that can make the codebase harder to navigate.
It is important to use the factory pattern judiciously, as overuse of the pattern can lead to a complex and hard-to-maintain codebase.
Observer pattern is a design pattern that allows objects to be notified of changes to other objects, without the objects being tightly coupled. This pattern defines a one-to-many relationship between objects, where one object, known as the subject, is being observed by multiple other objects, known as observers.
The Observer pattern has three main components: the subject, observer, and the client. The subject is the object being observed, the observer is the object that receives notifications from the subject, and the client is the object that creates and manages the subject and observer objects.
Here's an example of how the Observer pattern can be implemented in Java:
interface Subject {
void registerObserver(Observer o);
void removeObserver(Observer o);
void notifyObservers();
}
interface Observer {
void update(Subject s);
}
class WeatherData implements Subject {
private List<Observer> observers;
private float temperature;
private float humidity;
private float pressure;
public WeatherData() {
observers = new ArrayList<Observer>();
}
public void registerObserver(Observer o) {
observers.add(o);
}
public void removeObserver(Observer o) {
int i = observers.indexOf(o);
if (i >= 0) {
observers.remove(i);
}
}
public void notifyObservers() {
for (Observer observer : observers) {
observer.update(this);
}
}
public void measurementsChanged() {
notifyObservers();
}
public void setMeasurements(float temperature, float humidity, float pressure) {
this.temperature = temperature;
this.humidity = humidity;
this.pressure = pressure;
measurementsChanged();
}
public float getTemperature() {
return temperature;
}
public float getHumidity() {
return humidity;
}
public float getPressure() {
return pressure;
}
}In this example, the WeatherData class is the subject and the CurrentConditionsDisplay class is the observer. The WeatherData class maintains a list of registered observers and notifies them when the weather measurements change. The CurrentConditionsDisplay class implements the Observer interface and receives updates from the WeatherData class.
The Observer pattern has several benefits, such as:
- It allows objects to be notified of changes to other objects without the objects being tightly coupled
- It promotes loose coupling by separating the process of notifying objects from the objects that are notified
- It allows for the creation of dynamic systems, where the number and type of objects being observed can change at runtime
However, it also has some disadvantages, such as:
- It can lead to a large number of small classes that can make the codebase harder to navigate
- The observers are tightly coupled to the subject's interface, so changes to the subject's interface will break all existing observers
- It can make the code more complex and harder to understand
- It can make the code more difficult to test
It is important to use the observer pattern judiciously, as overuse of the pattern can lead to a complex and hard-to-maintain codebase.
The Decorator pattern is a design pattern that allows behavior to be added to an individual object, either statically or dynamically, without affecting the behavior of other objects from the same class. This pattern is used to extend the functionality of a class, by wrapping the original class in one or more decorator classes that add new behavior.
The Decorator pattern has four main components: the component interface, the concrete component, the decorator, and the concrete decorator.
- The component interface defines the interface for the objects that can have behavior added to them.
- The concrete component is the class that implements the component interface, and provides the basic behavior for the object.
- The decorator class is an abstract class that implements the component interface and has a reference to a component object.
- The concrete decorator is a concrete class that extends the decorator class, and adds new behavior to the component object.
Here's an example of how the Decorator pattern can be implemented in Java:
interface Shape {
void draw();
}
class Rectangle implements Shape {
public void draw() {
System.out.println("Drawing a rectangle");
}
}
abstract class ShapeDecorator implements Shape {
protected Shape decoratedShape;
public ShapeDecorator(Shape decoratedShape) {
this.decoratedShape = decoratedShape;
}
public void draw() {
decoratedShape.draw();
}
}
class RedShapeDecorator extends ShapeDecorator {
public RedShapeDecorator(Shape decoratedShape) {
super(decoratedShape);
}
@Override
public void draw() {
decoratedShape.draw();
setRedBorder(decoratedShape);
}
private void setRedBorder(Shape decoratedShape) {
System.out.println("Border Color: Red");
}
}In this example, the Shape interface defines the interface for the objects that can have behavior added to them. The Rectangle class is a concrete component that implements the Shape interface and provides the basic behavior for the object. The ShapeDecorator is an abstract class that implements the Shape interface and has a reference to a Shape object. The RedShapeDecorator is a concrete decorator that extends the ShapeDecorator class, and adds new behavior to the Shape object by drawing a red border.
The decorator pattern has several benefits, such as:
- It allows behavior to be added to an individual object without affecting the behavior of other objects from the same class.
- It allows for the creation of new functionality without changing the existing code.
- It promotes code reusability by allowing new functionality to be added through composition.
- It is a flexible alternative to subclassing, as new functionality can be added at runtime.
However, it also has some disadvantages, such as:
- It can make the code more complex and harder to understand, especially if there are many decorators.
- It can lead to a large number of small classes that can make the codebase harder to navigate.
- It can make the code more difficult to test, as each decorator must be tested individually.
It is important to use the decorator pattern judiciously, as overuse of the pattern can lead to a complex and hard-to-maintain codebase.
The Template Method pattern is a behavioral design pattern that defines the skeleton of an algorithm in a method, called the template method, and allows subclasses to provide their own implementation for one or more steps of the algorithm. The template method uses the Template Method design pattern to define the steps of an algorithm and to allow subclasses to provide their own implementation of one or more steps.
The Template Method pattern has three main components: the abstract class, the concrete class, and the hook methods.
- The abstract class defines the template method, which contains the skeleton of the algorithm. It also defines the hook methods, which are methods that have a default implementation but can be overridden by subclasses.
- The concrete class is a subclass of the abstract class, and it provides its own implementation for one or more of the hook methods.
- The hook methods are methods that have a default implementation in the abstract class, but can be overridden by subclasses to change the behavior of the algorithm.
Here's an example of how the Template Method pattern can be implemented in Java:
abstract class Game {
abstract void initialize();
abstract void startPlay();
abstract void endPlay();
//template method
public final void play(){
//initialize the game
initialize();
//start game
startPlay();
//end game
endPlay();
}
}
class Cricket extends Game {
@Override
void endPlay() {
System.out.println("Cricket Game Finished!");
}
@Override
void initialize() {
System.out.println("Cricket Game Initialized! Start playing.");
}
@Override
void startPlay() {
System.out.println("Cricket Game Started. Enjoy the game!");
}
}In this example, the Game class defines the template method play(), which contains the skeleton of the algorithm for playing a game. It also defines three hook methods initialize(), startPlay() and endPlay() which have a default implementation in the abstract class but can be overridden by subclasses to change the behavior of the algorithm.
The Cricket class is a concrete class that extends the Game class and provides its own implementation for the hook methods.
The template method pattern has several benefits, such as:
- It allows the common behavior of a class to be defined in a single place, making it easier to maintain.
- It promotes code reuse by allowing the common behavior to be shared among multiple classes.
- It provides a clear separation of concerns, as the common behavior is defined in the superclass, and the specific behavior is defined in the subclasses.
However, it also has some disadvantages, such as:
- It can lead to a large number of subclasses, as each specific behavior must be implemented in a separate class.
- It can make the code more difficult to understand, as the relationship between the superclass and the subclasses can be complex.
- It can make the code more difficult to test, as each subclass must be tested individually.
It is important to use the template method pattern judiciously, as overuse of the pattern can lead to a complex and hard-to-maintain codebase.
The Command pattern is a behavioral design pattern that encapsulates a request as an object, allowing for the parametrization of clients with different requests, and the queueing or logging of requests. The command pattern is an object behavioral pattern, which is used to encapsulate a request as an object and pass it to different objects.
The Command pattern has four main components: the command interface, the concrete command, the invoker, and the receiver.
- The command interface defines a single method, execute(), that must be implemented by all concrete commands.
- The concrete command is an implementation of the command interface, and it encapsulates the request and the receiver.
- The invoker is the object that initiates the request and it holds the command object.
- The receiver is the object that performs the action associated with the request.
Here's an example of how the Command pattern can be implemented in Java:
interface Command {
void execute();
}
class Light {
public void turnOn() {
System.out.println("The light is on");
}
public void turnOff() {
System.out.println("The light is off");
}
}
class FlipUpCommand implements Command {
private Light light;
public FlipUpCommand(Light light) {
this.light = light;
}
@Override
public void execute() {
light.turnOn();
}
}
class FlipDownCommand implements Command {
private Light light;
public FlipDownCommand(Light light) {
this.light = light;
}
@Override
public void execute() {
light.turnOff();
}
}
class Switch {
private Command flipUpCommand;
private Command flipDownCommand;
public Switch(Command flipUp, Command flipDown) {
this.flipUpCommand = flipUp;
this.flipDownCommand = flipDown;
}
public void flipUp() {
flipUpCommand.execute();
}
public void flipDown() {
flipDownCommand.execute();
}
}In this example, the Command interface defines the execute() method that must be implemented by all concrete command classes. The Light class represents the receiver, the FlipUpCommand and FlipDownCommand classes are concrete command classes that encapsulate the request and the receiver. The Switch class is the invoker, it holds the command object, and it initiates the request.
The Command pattern has several benefits, such as:
It promotes the separation of concerns, as the command classes are separate from the objects that execute the commands. It allows for the parametrization of clients with different requests. It allows for the undo or redo of requests by implementing a mechanism for storing and replaying commands. It allows for the queueing or logging of requests. However, it also has some disadvantages, such as:
- It can lead to a large number of small classes, as each command must be implemented as a separate class.
- It can make the code more difficult to understand, as the relationships between the command classes, the invoker, and the receiver can be complex.
- It can make the code more difficult to test, as each command class must be tested individually.
It is important to use the Command pattern judiciously, as overuse of the pattern can lead to a complex and hard-to-maintain codebase.
The Iterator pattern is a behavioral design pattern that provides a way to traverse a collection of objects without exposing the underlying representation of the collection. This allows for a consistent way to access elements of a collection, regardless of its underlying data structure.
The Iterator pattern has two main components: the iterator interface, and the concrete iterator.
- The iterator interface defines a set of methods that must be implemented by all concrete iterators. These methods typically include
hasNext(), which returns a boolean indicating whether there are more elements in the collection, andnext(), which returns the next element in the collection. - The concrete iterator is an implementation of the iterator interface, and it provides the specific implementation for traversing the collection.
Here's an example of how the Iterator pattern can be implemented in Java:
interface Iterator<T> {
boolean hasNext();
T next();
}
interface Collection<T> {
Iterator<T> iterator();
}
class ConcreteIterator<T> implements Iterator<T> {
private Collection<T> collection;
private int position;
public ConcreteIterator(Collection<T> collection) {
this.collection = collection;
this.position = 0;
}
@Override
public boolean hasNext() {
return position < collection.size();
}
@Override
public T next() {
return collection.get(position++);
}
}
class ConcreteCollection<T> implements Collection<T> {
private List<T> list = new ArrayList<>();
@Override
public Iterator<T> iterator() {
return new ConcreteIterator<>(this);
}
public int size() {
return list.size();
}
public T get(int index) {
return list.get(index);
}
public void add(T element) {
list.add(element);
}
}In this example, the Iterator interface defines the hasNext() and next() methods that must be implemented by all concrete iterators.
The Collection interface defines the iterator() method that must be implemented by all concrete collections.
The ConcreteIterator class is a concrete iterator that provides the specific implementation for traversing a
ConcreteCollection and the ConcreteCollection class is a concrete collection that holds a list of elements and provides an iterator for traversing it.
The Iterator pattern has several benefits, such as:
- It promotes the separation of concerns, as the collection classes are separate from the classes that traverse the collections.
- It allows for a consistent way to access elements of a collection, regardless of its underlying data structure.
- It allows for the easy addition of new traversal operations, such as filtering or sorting, by creating new iterators.
However, it also has some disadvantages, such as:
- It can lead to a large number of small classes, as each iterator must be implemented as a separate class.
- It can make the code more difficult to understand, as the relationships between the iterator classes and the collection classes can be complex.
- It can make the code more difficult to test, as each iterator class must be tested individually.
It is important to use the Iterator pattern judiciously, as overusing it can lead to a proliferation of small classes and increase the complexity of the code.
The State pattern is a behavioral design pattern that allows an object to change its behavior based on its internal state. It encapsulates the behavior for each state of the object into a separate class, called a state class. This allows the object to change its behavior at runtime by changing its state class.
The State pattern has three main components: the context, the state interface, and the state classes.
- The context is the object whose behavior changes based on its internal state. It maintains a reference to the current state class and delegates the behavior to it.
- The state interface defines the methods that must be implemented by all state classes. These methods represent the behavior of the object in that state.
- The state classes are implementations of the state interface, and they provide the specific behavior for the object in that state.
Here's an example of how the State pattern can be implemented in Java:
interface State {
void handle();
}
class Context {
private State state;
public Context(State state) {
this.state = state;
}
public void setState(State state) {
this.state = state;
}
public void handle() {
state.handle();
}
}
class ConcreteStateA implements State {
@Override
public void handle() {
// behavior for state A
}
}
class ConcreteStateB implements State {
@Override
public void handle() {
// behavior for state B
}
}In this example, the State interface defines the handle() method that must be implemented by all state
classes. The Context class is the object whose behavior changes based on its internal state. It maintains
a reference to the current state class and delegates the behavior to it.
The ConcreteStateA and ConcreteStateB classes are concrete state classes that provide the specific
behavior for the object in state A and B respectively.
The State pattern has several benefits, such as:
- It promotes the separation of concerns, as the object's behavior is encapsulated in separate state classes.
- It allows for a flexible way to change the object's behavior at runtime, by changing its state class.
- It makes the code more readable and maintainable, as the behavior for each state is defined in a separate class.
However, it also has some disadvantages, such as:
- It can lead to a large number of small classes, as each state must be implemented as a separate class.
- It can make the code more difficult to understand, as the relationships between the state classes and the context class can be complex.
- It can make the code more difficult to test, as each state class must be tested individually.
It is important to use the State pattern judiciously, as overusing it can lead to a proliferation of small classes and increase the complexity of the code. It is useful when an object's behavior changes significantly based on its internal state, and it is more appropriate than using a large number of conditionals to change the object's behavior.