| #cloud-config | |
| # Enable automatic package updates and upgrades during cloud-init execution | |
| package_update: true | |
| package_upgrade: true | |
| packages: | |
| # Security and Hardening | |
| - ufw | |
| - fail2ban |
These instructions cover:
- building a cross toolchain
- populating the new ROOT
- making it
chrootable using qemu-user to easily run "native" builds or tests (this is like a stage3 at the end)
You do not need to follow through to the end if you don't need a stage3-like root.
| #!/bin/sh | |
| # | |
| # Utility script to rsync and then open a shell or execute commands on a remote host. | |
| # Tailored a little bit for Lucene/Solr | |
| # @author David Smiley | |
| # https://gist.github.com/dsmiley/daff3c978fe234b48a69a01b54ea9914 | |
| set -uex | |
| REMOTEHOST=buildbox | |
| REMOTEPATH="builds$PWD" |
FWIW: I (@rondy) am not the creator of the content shared here, which is an excerpt from Edmond Lau's book. I simply copied and pasted it from another location and saved it as a personal note, before it gained popularity on news.ycombinator.com. Unfortunately, I cannot recall the exact origin of the original source, nor was I able to find the author's name, so I am can't provide the appropriate credits.
- By Edmond Lau
- Highly Recommended 👍
- http://www.theeffectiveengineer.com/
I've been asked a few times over the last few months to put together a full write-up of the Git workflow we use at RichRelevance (and at Precog before), since I have referenced it in passing quite a few times in tweets and in person. The workflow is appreciably different from GitFlow and its derivatives, and thus it brings with it a different set of tradeoffs and optimizations. To that end, it would probably be helpful to go over exactly what workflow benefits I find to be beneficial or even necessary.
- Two developers working on independent features must never be blocked by each other
- No code freeze! Ever! For any reason!
- A developer must be able to base derivative work on another developer's work, without waiting for any third party
- Two developers working on inter-dependent features (or even the same feature) must be able to do so without interference from (or interfering with) any other parties
- Developers must be able to work on multiple features simultaneously, or at lea
(by @andrestaltz)
If you prefer to watch video tutorials with live-coding, then check out this series I recorded with the same contents as in this article: Egghead.io - Introduction to Reactive Programming.
L1 cache reference ......................... 0.5 ns
Branch mispredict ............................ 5 ns
L2 cache reference ........................... 7 ns
Mutex lock/unlock ........................... 25 ns
Main memory reference ...................... 100 ns
Compress 1K bytes with Zippy ............. 3,000 ns = 3 µs
Send 2K bytes over 1 Gbps network ....... 20,000 ns = 20 µs
SSD random read ........................ 150,000 ns = 150 µs
Read 1 MB sequentially from memory ..... 250,000 ns = 250 µs
| Latency Comparison Numbers (~2012) | |
| ---------------------------------- | |
| L1 cache reference 0.5 ns | |
| Branch mispredict 5 ns | |
| L2 cache reference 7 ns 14x L1 cache | |
| Mutex lock/unlock 25 ns | |
| Main memory reference 100 ns 20x L2 cache, 200x L1 cache | |
| Compress 1K bytes with Zippy 3,000 ns 3 us | |
| Send 1K bytes over 1 Gbps network 10,000 ns 10 us | |
| Read 4K randomly from SSD* 150,000 ns 150 us ~1GB/sec SSD |