linkedin_article.txt

# From Frustrated Developer to Successful Build: My AI-Assisted Embedded Journey

We spent a hackathon day exploring a question: How much can AI actually achieve in embedded development? Can it handle everything from setting up tools, to design, implementation, debugging, and testing?

Working with Mahendra Tailor and Youssif Saeed (who provided valuable Zephyr expertise), we tackled Zephyr RTOS, which we all agree has a steep learning curve. To our astonishment, the answer was yes. AI can handle it all.

By the end of the hackathon, we had built a complete AI-integrated embedded system with Bluetooth connectivity, an AT style command interface, and even deployed an MCP (Model Context Protocol) for connecting the hardware to AI as a learning exercise.

## The Third Time's the Charm

This is not my first attempt at Zephyr development. **I've failed at this twice before.** Two previous attempts to build Bluetooth applications with Zephyr ended in frustration. The toolchain complexity, extremely complex documnetation, cryptic build errors, and the lack of fool proof automation stopped me in my tracks both times.

Today was different. Not because I suddenly became smarter, but because I had the right tools (AI).

## Starting from Scratch (Again)

The whole thing took about 6 hours, including a dinner break with Biryani, courtesy of Manna. Thank you Manna! We started with almost zero Zephyr RTOS experience (on my part) and only battle scars from previous failed attempts. By the end, we had:
- A fully configured Zephyr development environment
- A Bluetooth Low Energy heart rate service and BLE scan, connect, and advertise capabilities
- Custom AT command interface for device control and experiementation
- A Python MCP (Model Context Protocol) application bridging Bluetooth to AI (as a learning task)
- **The ability to control our hardware device using natural language**

That last point deserves emphasis. By the end of the day, we could literally type commands in plain English to Claude, and it would communicate with the nRF52 hardware over Bluetooth. No more memorizing AT commands or consulting datasheets. Just "scan for Bluetooth devices" or "connect to the heart rate sensor" in natural language.

## The Power of AI-Assisted Development

What made this possible? Claude Code did the heavy lifting. Let me be honest about the division of labor:

1. **Set up the entire Zephyr toolchain.** Claude handled the SDK installations, dependencies, and environment variables
2. **Solved gnarly system level issues.** Hit a 32 bit library dpkg compatibility nightmare on my Linux system? I spun up a second Claude session that debugged and fixed the incompatible libraries while I continued my main work
3. **Generated working Bluetooth code.** Claude built a standards compliant BLE heart rate service with full scan, connect, and advertise capabilities
4. **Implemented AT command parsing.** Claude created a robust command interface for device interaction
5. **Bridged embedded and AI worlds.** Claude developed the Python MCP application that connects the hardware's AT command interface to AI capabilities

My role? I helped it get unstuck a few times, when working on the MCP that needed to communicate with the hardware via the serial port, by showing it raw serial port output when the parsing wasn't working. After seeing a couple of examples, it would figure out the issue and fix the code.

## AI is Powerful, But It Needs Direction

Let me be clear about the division of labor: **AI does about 99% of the work.** Setup, code writing, testing, and most debugging. Claude handles it all.

But that remaining 1% matters. Here's where my experience in embedded systems made the difference:

**Debugging edge cases:** When the serial parsing failed, I could quickly recognize the issue and provide the specific debugging data Claude needed. The AI does significant debugging on its own, but sometimes it needs targeted help to get unstuck.

**Design direction (especially for larger projects):** While this project was relatively straightforward, I've found that on larger, more complex systems, AI benefits from architectural guidance. Someone with domain expertise needs to set the direction and validate that the approach makes sense.

Without foundational knowledge in embedded systems, Bluetooth protocols, and serial communication, we wouldn't have known when to intervene or what guidance to provide. But with that background, the AI becomes incredibly powerful. It handles all the tedious implementation work while we focus on the high level decisions and troubleshooting.

**The sweet spot:** Experienced developers who understand the principles but are learning a new framework or toolchain. That's where AI assistance delivers maximum value.

## Previous Experience with Embedded Build Systems

This isn't my first experience using Claude with complex embedded toolchains. I've documented similar successes with:

- <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/dsiganos/">Yocto Project</a> (see my previous article)
- <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/dsiganos/">Buildroot</a> (see my previous article)

In each case, Claude was able to handle the setup, configuration, and troubleshooting of these notoriously difficult build systems. The pattern holds: AI assistance works well with embedded toolchains, not just application development.

## The Real Wow Factor: Natural Language Hardware Control

Here's what made this project particularly exciting: by the end of the day, we could control the physical nRF52 hardware using natural language through Claude.

The MCP bridge we built connects the hardware's AT command interface directly to AI. The key is that MCP exposes "tools" to the AI. Each tool has a name, description, and action. For example, a scan_ble tool with description "Scan for nearby Bluetooth devices" tells Claude exactly what's available and how to use it.

This means we can type things like "scan for nearby Bluetooth devices" in plain English, and Claude knows to call the scan_ble tool, which translates to the appropriate AT commands, sends them over the serial port, parses the response, and shows us the results. The tools provide the context the AI needs to interact with the hardware.

No more memorizing command syntax. No more consulting datasheets. Just natural conversation with the hardware. For someone unfamiliar with MCP (Model Context Protocol), this might sound like science fiction, but it's very real and surprisingly straightforward to set up with AI assistance.

## What This Means for Embedded Development

This experience highlights a fundamental shift happening in embedded systems development:

**The barrier to entry is collapsing.** Complex embedded projects that once required weeks of ramp up time can now be tackled in a single day. I know this firsthand. I went from two failures to a working system, and the only variable that changed was having AI assistance. This doesn't replace deep expertise. It amplifies it and makes it accessible to more developers.

**Integration is getting easier.** Connecting embedded devices to modern AI systems used to require extensive integration work. With tools like MCP and AI-assisted coding, these bridges can be built quickly and reliably.

**Iteration speed is everything.** When you can go from idea to working prototype in hours instead of weeks, you can explore more possibilities and find better solutions faster.

## The Technical Stack

For those interested in the details:
- **Hardware**: Nordic nRF52 (real hardware, not simulation)
- **OS**: Zephyr RTOS (learned from scratch today)
- **Connectivity**: Bluetooth Low Energy with Heart Rate Profile
- **Interface**: Custom AT command protocol
- **Bridge**: Python MCP server
- **AI Integration**: Claude Code for development + MCP for runtime

## Reflections

What strikes me most about this experience isn't just the speed. It's overcoming previous failure with the right tools. The problems that blocked me twice before (toolchain setup, Bluetooth configuration, integration complexity) were handled almost entirely by the AI. I was mostly an observer, jumping in only when it hit a snag.

When debugging the serial interface, I'd paste the raw serial port output into the chat. After seeing a couple of examples, Claude would spot the pattern and fix the parsing. That was the extent of my "contribution". Providing real world debugging data when needed.

And when I hit a completely unrelated roadblock (dpkg library incompatibilities on my Linux system), I didn't lose momentum. I opened a second Claude session that fixed that problem while I continued my main development. In the past, that kind of detour would have derailed the entire day.

I now understand Zephyr's architecture, Bluetooth service implementation, and MCP integration not because I read documentation or figured things out myself, but because I watched the AI build something real and learned by observing.

**For anyone who's tried and failed at complex embedded projects:** This isn't about being smarter or working harder. The tools have fundamentally changed. What was impossible for me six months ago became routine today.

This is the future of embedded development: faster prototyping, lower barriers to entry, and more time spent on innovation rather than configuration.

---

Have you experimented with AI-assisted embedded development? I'd love to hear about your experiences in the comments.

#EmbeddedSystems #ZephyrRTOS #Bluetooth #AI #DeveloperTools #Innovation #IoT #MCP