This feedback was motivated by your lecture: "On the volumes of higher-dimensional spheres"
First, I just want to say I love that you made this video. I think you brush off the gaussian discussion a bit too quickly though. In particular, I think an aside on the gaussian perspective gives a stronger intuition about how the concentration of measure works. In the video, you proposed that the measure concentrates at the "equator". Personally, I consider it pretty hard to reason about what the "equator" of a high dimensional sphere is.
Instead, I think a much easier way to think about this is that the volume concentrates along the circumference. Concretely, rather than the equator of a sphere, the visual you should be motivating is a thin shell at the surface of the sphere. In high dimensions, that "equator" is really any great circle wrt the origin, which sweeps out the shell.
I've heard this referred to as "the gaussian annulus theorem". Not sure who to attribute it to.