Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@danecjensen
Created January 11, 2026 11:48
Show Gist options
  • Select an option

  • Save danecjensen/a39ee9e1f72bb7fdcbec8a5ab25f6c29 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Select an option

Save danecjensen/a39ee9e1f72bb7fdcbec8a5ab25f6c29 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
conductor.starter.md

If you mean Conductor (conductor.build): it’s a macOS app for running multiple Claude Code agents in parallel, where each agent gets an isolated workspace (separate copy + branch/worktree) so they don’t step on each other’s changes. (Conductor)

How to “spin up teams of Claude” in Conductor

1) Install + add your repo

  • Download + install Conductor on Mac. (Conductor)
  • Add a repository; Conductor creates a first workspace (isolated copy + branch). (Conductor)

2) Create parallel agents (workspaces)

  • Each new workspace is effectively “another Claude Code instance” working in isolation.
  • Create more agents by creating more workspaces (e.g., ⌘N / new workspace flow depending on your setup). (Conductor)

3) Make it frictionless with conductor.json

Put a conductor.json in the repo/workspace root to automate setup and running:

{
  "scripts": {
    "setup": "npm install; ln -s \"$CONDUCTOR_ROOT_PATH/.env\" .env",
    "run": "npm run dev"
  },
  "runScriptMode": "nonconcurrent"
}
  • setup runs on workspace creation (install deps, copy/symlink .env, etc.). (Conductor)
  • run is the “Run” button (server/tests). (Conductor)
  • nonconcurrent is useful if you can’t run multiple dev servers simultaneously. (Conductor)

4) Give the “team” clear roles (works well in practice)

Create 4–6 workspaces and assign each Claude a single responsibility:

  • PM/Planner agent: breaks down the task into PR-sized chunks + acceptance criteria.
  • Implementer agent(s): each takes one chunk (API, UI, migrations, etc.).
  • Test agent: writes/updates tests, runs them, fixes flaky parts.
  • Reviewer agent: reviews diffs, flags risks, asks for refactors.
  • Docs/Changelog agent: updates README, docs, release notes.

Then you (the human) do the “conducting”: review diffs, run tests, merge. Conductor’s workflow is explicitly built around “create workspace → develop → review/test → PR/merge → archive.” (Conductor)

5) Optional: connect tools via MCP (high leverage)

Conductor supports MCP so Claude Code can access external tools/data sources. (Conductor) Example from their docs:

claude mcp add context7 -s user -- npx -y @upstash/context7-mcp

(Conductor)

6) One operational note

Conductor ships with its own bundled Claude Code (and Codex). (Conductor)


If you tell me what stack you’re on (Rails/Next/Django/etc.) and whether you want many parallel feature agents vs a tight reviewer/tester loop, I can suggest a concrete “workspace template” (prompts + role checklist + a conductor.json tuned for your repo).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment