Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@bgauryy
Last active January 1, 2026 20:42
Show Gist options
  • Select an option

  • Save bgauryy/216fb26205138f0b455a15d09f4fb22c to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Select an option

Save bgauryy/216fb26205138f0b455a15d09f4fb22c to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Head-to-head comparison of Octocode MCP local tools vs Cursor's built-in tools on the Linux kernel (100K+ files). Tests four tool categories—code search, directory listing, file reading, and file finding—using identical queries. Evaluates output structure, metadata richness, pagination, token efficiency, and actionable guidance. Result: Octocode…

🔬 ADVANCED DEPTH COMPARISON: Octocode MCP vs Cursor Internal Tools

Repository: Linux Kernel (100K+ Files)


🎯 Motivation

Cursor provides built-in local tools (grep, list_dir, read_file, glob_file_search) that AI agents use to explore and understand codebases. These tools are fast, simple, and familiar—but are they sufficient for large-scale code research?

Octocode MCP offers an alternative set of local tools (localSearchCode, localViewStructure, localGetFileContent, localFindFiles) designed specifically for AI agent workflows. These tools promise richer metadata, smarter pagination, research context preservation, and token-efficient outputs.

The question: When working on massive codebases like the Linux kernel, do Octocode's specialized tools provide meaningful advantages over Cursor's native capabilities? This comparison tests both toolsets head-to-head on identical queries to determine which excels at structured exploration, surgical code reading, and efficient large-scale navigation.


📋 Testing Methodology

This comparison was conducted by executing identical queries using both Cursor's internal tools (grep, list_dir, read_file, glob_file_search) and Octocode MCP local tools (localSearchCode, localViewStructure, localGetFileContent, localFindFiles) against the Linux kernel repository—a massive codebase with over 100,000 files.

Each test was run in parallel within the same Cursor session, ensuring identical conditions. The queries targeted real-world scenarios: searching for mutex_lock patterns in scheduler code, exploring deeply nested directories like drivers/net/ and arch/, reading large header files (include/linux/sched.h) to find specific structures, and discovering C files across directory hierarchies. Results were compared across multiple dimensions: output format, metadata richness, pagination behavior, token efficiency, location precision, and actionable guidance. The raw outputs from both toolsets were captured and analyzed side-by-side to determine winners for each metric.

TEST PLAN


📊 COMPREHENSIVE TEST RESULTS

Test 1: Code Search (mutex_lock in kernel/sched/*.c)

Metric Cursor grep Octocode localSearchCode Winner
Matches Found 31 matches 31 matches Tie
Files Found 8 files 8 files Tie
Output Format file:line:content text JSON with structured metadata Octocode
Location Precision Line number only Line, column, byteOffset, charOffset 🏆 Octocode
Pagination Info None (truncates with "...") page 1/1, hasMore: false 🏆 Octocode
Search Engine Reported Not shown searchEngine: "rg" Octocode
Total Stats Count in header totalMatches: 31, totalFiles: 8 Octocode
Hints/Next Steps None 18+ actionable hints 🏆 Octocode
Context Lines -C 3 works well contextLines: 3 Tie
Match Value Truncation Full content shown Truncated to 200 chars (configurable) Cursor
Research Context None researchGoal, reasoning preserved 🏆 Octocode

Test 2: Directory Listing (Depth Control)

Test 2a: drivers/net/ depth 2 exploration

Metric Cursor list_dir Octocode localViewStructure Winner
Total Files Shows subtree counts (e.g., [3404 files in subtree]) 595 files (explicit total) Tie (different approaches)
Total Directories Not explicitly reported 191 directories 🏆 Octocode
Total Size Not reported 11,164,674 bytes 🏆 Octocode
Output Format Tree with subtree file counts by extension Tree with [FILE]/[DIR] markers + sizes Octocode
File Sizes Not shown Per-file sizes (e.g., "88.9KB", "20.8KB") 🏆 Octocode
Pagination No pagination (shows all) Page 1/40, 20 entries/page 🏆 Octocode
Subtree Analysis ✅ Shows [17 files: 12 *.c, 3 *.h] ❌ No subtree file counts 🏆 Cursor
Depth Control Single level only depth param (1-5) 🏆 Octocode
Extension Breakdown ✅ Per-directory breakdown Shows extension in output 🏆 Cursor

Test 2b: arch/ directory overview

Metric Cursor list_dir Octocode localViewStructure Winner
Architecture Dirs All 22 listed with file counts All 22 listed (paginated) Tie
Subtree Statistics [4549 files: 1704 *.dts, 1067 *.dtsi, 654 *.c] ❌ Just counts 🏆 Cursor
Quick Overview Immediate full picture Requires pagination 🏆 Cursor
Token Safety Higher token usage Bounded output 🏆 Octocode

Test 3: File Content Reading

include/linux/sched.h - Finding struct task_struct

Metric Cursor read_file Octocode localGetFileContent Winner
Pattern Matching ❌ Not supported (offset/limit only) matchString with context 🏆 Octocode
Total Lines Reported ... 1645 lines not shown ... at end 2,444 lines (upfront) 🏆 Octocode
Smart Extraction No (reads sequential lines) ... [N lines omitted] ... markers 🏆 Octocode
Match Ranges N/A 10 match ranges with line numbers 🏆 Octocode
Content Returned 100 lines (as requested) 18,397 chars (smart selection) 🏆 Octocode
Line Numbers 700|content format ✅ Included Tie
Partial Indicator ... N lines not shown ... isPartial: true + bounds 🏆 Octocode
Token Efficiency Medium (fixed window) Very High (pattern-targeted) 🏆 Octocode
Warnings None "Pattern matched 94 lines. Truncated to first 50" 🏆 Octocode

Test 4: File Finding

Find *.c files in drivers/net/

Metric Cursor glob_file_search Octocode localFindFiles Winner
Files Found 3,528 files (full count) 1,000 files (paginated) Cursor (raw count)
Total Reported Array length shown totalFiles: 1000 (depth-limited) Tie
Output Format Relative paths only Full metadata per file 🏆 Octocode
File Sizes ❌ Not included ✅ Included (e.g., 68672 bytes) 🏆 Octocode
Permissions ❌ Not included 644, etc. 🏆 Octocode
Modified Dates Sorted by mtime (implicit) "2025-12-31T07:54:25.519Z" 🏆 Octocode
File Type ❌ None type: "file" 🏆 Octocode
Depth Limiting ❌ Full recursion maxDepth: 3 🏆 Octocode
Pagination ... 3365 more files ... Page 1/50, hasMore: true 🏆 Octocode
Token Safety High output (all paths) Bounded (20 files/page) 🏆 Octocode

🏆 FINAL SCORECARD

Test Category Cursor Wins Octocode Wins Ties
Code Search 1 7 2
Directory Listing 3 5 2
File Content 0 8 1
File Finding 1 7 1
TOTAL 5 27 6

📌 KEY DIFFERENTIATORS

Cursor Internal Tools: Strengths

Feature Value
Subtree File Analysis [17 files: 12 *.c, 3 *.h, 2 *no-ext] per directory
Extension Breakdown Immediate visibility of file type distribution
Full Content in Context Match values shown in full (not truncated)
Speed No MCP overhead, direct filesystem access
Simplicity Familiar grep/ls mental model

Octocode MCP Tools: Strengths

Feature Value
Byte/Char Offsets Precise byteOffset: 11824, charOffset: 11824
Pagination System page 1/40, hasMore: true, totalPages: 40
Research Context researchGoal, reasoning preserved across calls
Actionable Hints 15-20 hints per response for next steps
File Metadata Size, permissions, modified dates per file
Token Safety Bounded output with configurable limits
Smart Extraction matchString with context lines in file reading
Depth Control Explicit depth, maxDepth parameters
Summary Statistics totalFiles: 595, totalDirectories: 191, totalSize: 11,164,674

🎯 USE CASE RECOMMENDATIONS

Task Recommended Tool Reason
Quick directory overview with file types Cursor list_dir Subtree counts by extension
Deep structure exploration Octocode localViewStructure Depth control + size stats
Finding specific code pattern Both effective Context support in both
Research with multiple follow-ups Octocode Research context preservation
Reading specific struct/function Octocode localGetFileContent matchString targeting
Finding files by metadata Octocode localFindFiles Time/size/permission filters
Simple file discovery Cursor glob_file_search Fast, full results
Token-constrained exploration Octocode Pagination + limits
Understanding project structure Cursor list_dir Extension breakdown
Large file surgical reading Octocode Pattern-based extraction

🔑 VERDICT

Octocode MCP Local Tools win on structure, metadata richness, pagination safety, and research workflow support.

Cursor Internal Tools win on subtree analysis, extension breakdowns, simplicity, and speed.

For the Linux Kernel (or any massive codebase):

  • Use Octocode for systematic research, deep exploration, and token-efficient operations
  • Use Cursor for quick structural overviews and when you need immediate file type distributions

Test Date: 2026-01-01 | Model: Claude Opus 4.5

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment