Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@bar181
Created January 22, 2026 18:17
Show Gist options
  • Select an option

  • Save bar181/3d6ff03f77e08141df16c084e18f5aa0 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Select an option

Save bar181/3d6ff03f77e08141df16c084e18f5aa0 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

AISP + Coherence Engine Integration

Final Specification — Two Orthogonal Complements

Version: 4.0 (Final)
Date: January 22, 2026
Core Insight: AISP and Coherence Engine are orthogonal complements — AISP ensures precise communication (spec-time), Coherence ensures consistent state (run-time)


The Fundamental Distinction

System Core Question When
AISP "Is what I'm saying unambiguous?" Spec-time / Compile-time
Coherence Engine "Does reality still fit together?" Run-time / State-time

Neither replaces the other. A full system needs both.


One-Page Summary

Aspect AISP Coherence Engine
Analogy Precise recipe Kitchen that detects when ingredients conflict
Measures Ambiguity (Ambig < 0.02) Incoherence (Energy E)
Quality Score δ (density) E (energy)
Good = High δ (≥ 0.75) Low E (near 0)
Bad = Low δ (ambiguous) High E (inconsistent)
Gate δ < 0.60 → no deploy E > threshold → escalate
Proof ⟦Ε⟧ evidence block WitnessRecord with hash chain
Learning Hebbian 10:1 penalty SONA + GNN + EWC++
Math Category Theory + ΠΣ Types Sheaf Laplacian + Category Theory
Target AI-to-AI communication AI-to-reality consistency

What Each System Cannot Do

Understanding boundaries is critical for proper integration:

AISP Cannot Coherence Engine Cannot
Detect runtime state inconsistency Reduce spec ambiguity
Know if reality matches the spec Make specs more precise
Monitor live system health Improve AI-to-AI communication
Detect sensor disagreement Enforce document structure
Verify execution correctness Validate specification quality

Integration Principle: Each system handles what the other cannot.


Part 1: Phase-Based Integration

The systems integrate across the full lifecycle:

Phase 1: Design (AISP Only)

Owner: AISP
Purpose: Create unambiguous specifications

AISP Actions:

  • Write specification using Σ_512 symbol vocabulary
  • Structure with required blocks: ⟦Ω⟧, ⟦Σ⟧, ⟦Γ⟧, ⟦Λ⟧, ⟦Ε⟧
  • Define types, rules, functions, error handlers
  • Ensure single-token semantics (each symbol has exactly one meaning)

Quality Target: Ambig(D) < 0.02

Coherence Role: None at this phase


Phase 2: Compile/Validate (AISP Only)

Owner: AISP
Purpose: Verify specification quality before deployment

AISP Actions:

  • Parse specification into AST
  • Compute density score δ
  • Verify well-formedness (grammar compliance)
  • Check completeness φ (required blocks present)
  • Assign quality tier τ
  • Generate ⟦Ε⟧ evidence block

Gate Decision:

  • δ ≥ 0.75 → Tier ◊⁺⁺ (Platinum) — Ready for production
  • δ ≥ 0.60 → Tier ◊⁺ (Gold) — Ready for deployment
  • δ ≥ 0.40 → Tier ◊ (Silver) — Acceptable with monitoring
  • δ ≥ 0.20 → Tier ◊⁻ (Bronze) — Needs review
  • δ < 0.20 → Tier ⊘ (Reject) — Do not deploy

Coherence Role: None at this phase


Phase 3: Deploy (Handoff Point)

Owner: Both — this is the integration boundary
Purpose: Transform validated spec into runtime entity

AISP Actions:

  • Package specification into Pocket structure
  • Generate Header with content-addressed ID: ℋ.id = SHA256(𝒩)
  • Compute Signal embedding: V = V_H ⊕ V_L ⊕ V_S
  • Initialize Membrane with default affinity map
  • Optionally compile to LLVM IR or WASM

Coherence Actions:

  • Receive Pocket as SheafNode
  • Verify CAS integrity: confirm SHA256(Nucleus) = Header.id
  • Register node in SheafGraph with state = Signal (1536-dim)
  • Initialize edges based on existing graph structure
  • Set initial energy baseline

Mapping at Deploy:

AISP Component Coherence Component Transfer
ℋ.id (Hash) NodeId Direct copy
ℋ.V (Signal) Node state vector Direct copy (1536-dim)
ℋ.f (Flags) Node metadata.flags Direct copy
ℳ (Membrane) Edge weight source Will sync at runtime
𝒩.def (Spec) Constraint reference Reference only
⟦Ε⟧.δ (Density) Initial quality weight Influences energy interpretation
⟦Ε⟧.τ (Tier) Initial lane suggestion Maps to compute lane

Phase 4: Execute (Coherence Primary, AISP Reference)

Owner: Coherence Engine
Purpose: Monitor state consistency during execution

Coherence Actions:

  • Compute residuals for all edges: r_e = ρ_source(x_source) - ρ_target(x_target)
  • Aggregate into global energy: E = Σ w_e |r_e|²
  • Evaluate gate based on energy thresholds
  • Assign compute lane (Reflex / Retrieval / Heavy / Human)
  • Create WitnessRecord for every gate decision
  • Monitor for persistent incoherence

Gate Thresholds:

Energy Level Lane Latency Action
E < ε₀ 0 (Reflex) <1ms Proceed without additional checks
ε₀ ≤ E < ε₁ 1 (Retrieval) ~10ms Fetch additional context
ε₁ ≤ E < ε₂ 2 (Heavy) ~100ms Deep reasoning required
E ≥ ε₂ 3 (Human) Async Escalate to human

AISP Role at Execute:

  • Tier from ⟦Ε⟧ provides default lane suggestion
  • Spec defines expected behaviors (reference for anomaly detection)
  • Binding function Δ⊗λ determines edge existence

Combined Lane Decision:

  • AISP tier suggests: ◊⁺⁺→Reflex, ◊⁺→Reflex/Retrieval, ◊→Retrieval, ◊⁻→Heavy, ⊘→Human
  • Coherence energy suggests: Low→Reflex, Medium→Retrieval, High→Heavy, Critical→Human
  • Final lane = max(tier_suggestion, energy_suggestion) — always take more conservative

Phase 5: Coordinate (Both Systems Active)

Owner: Both
Purpose: Manage multi-entity interactions

AISP Actions:

  • Evaluate binding compatibility: Δ⊗λ(A, B)
  • Determine binding state: Crash(0), Null(1), Adapt(2), Zero(3)
  • Update membrane affinity based on interaction outcome
  • Apply DCE optimization for zero-cost bindings

Coherence Actions:

  • Create/update edges based on binding state
  • Compute edge-specific residuals
  • Derive restriction maps from binding semantics
  • Monitor coordination energy

Binding → Edge Mapping:

Δ⊗λ State Edge Created Edge Weight Restriction Map Expected Residual
0 (Crash) No Infinite (never compute)
1 (Null) Yes 0.3 (weak) Minimal common interface High (expected)
2 (Adapt) Yes 0.6 (medium) Learned transformation Moderate (acceptable)
3 (Zero) Yes 1.0 (strong) Identity Near-zero (required)

Residual Interpretation:

  • Zero-cost binding + residual > 0.01: Contract violation — escalate
  • Adapt binding + residual > 2× expected: Adaptation drift — investigate
  • Null binding + residual > 1.0: Socket strain — acceptable but monitor

Phase 6: Learn (Both Systems Active)

Owner: Both with coordination
Purpose: Improve future performance from outcomes

AISP Hebbian Learning:

Event Affinity Update Confidence Update
Success aff[A,B] += 1 conf' = σ(logit(conf) + 0.1)
Failure aff[A,B] -= 10 conf' = σ(logit(conf) - 0.05)

Key: 10:1 asymmetry means failures are heavily penalized

Skip Threshold: aff[A,B] < τ_v (0.7) → skip future attempts with B

Coherence SONA Learning:

Loop Timing Mechanism Purpose
Instant <0.05ms Micro-LoRA Immediate threshold adjustment
Background Async Base-LoRA Gradual optimization
Consolidation Periodic EWC++ Prevent catastrophic forgetting

Learning Coordination:

Event AISP Action Coherence Action Cross-System
Success aff += 1, conf boost Confirm threshold Store low-energy pattern
Failure aff -= 10, conf reduce Adapt threshold Lower threshold for scope
Pattern emerges Store in ReasoningBank
Periodic Check eviction EWC++ consolidate Sync confidence to weights

Unified Skip Decision:

  1. Check AISP: aff < τ_v?
  2. Check Coherence: repeated failures in ReasoningBank?
  3. Check Energy: edge energy > threshold?
  4. Skip if ANY condition true

Phase 7: Audit (Both Systems Contribute)

Owner: Both
Purpose: Provide complete provenance trail

AISP Evidence (⟦Ε⟧):

  • δ: Density score at compile time
  • φ: Completeness percentage
  • τ: Quality tier assigned
  • ⊢: List of formal proofs

Coherence Witness:

  • Energy snapshot at decision time
  • Gate decision (allow/deny)
  • Compute lane assigned
  • Policy bundle reference
  • Previous witness hash (chain)

Unified Audit Record:

Field Source Purpose
spec_delta AISP ⟦Ε⟧ Spec quality at compile
spec_tier AISP ⟦Ε⟧ Quality classification
spec_proofs AISP ⟦Ε⟧ Formal guarantees
coherence_energy Coherence Runtime consistency
gate_decision Coherence Action taken
compute_lane Coherence Resource level used
binding_state Both Coordination compatibility
timestamp Coherence When decision made
previous_hash Coherence Chain integrity
content_hash Both Record integrity

Unified Quality Score:

unified_quality = (0.5 × δ) + (0.5 × (1 - min(E, 1)))

Combines spec quality with runtime coherence.


Phase 8: Fail (Both Systems Contribute)

Owner: Both
Purpose: Handle failures safely

AISP Failure Modes:

Failure Detection Response
Tier ⊘ δ < 0.20 Do not deploy
Ambiguity Ambig ≥ 0.02 Reject and clarify
Parse error Grammar violation Reject with error location
CAS mismatch SHA256(𝒩) ≠ ℋ.id Quarantine pocket

Coherence Failure Modes:

Failure Detection Response
High energy E ≥ ε₂ Escalate to human
Persistent incoherence E > threshold for duration Force escalation
Safety violation V_S residual > critical Immediate block
Spectral drift Eigenvalue shift > threshold Alert and investigate

Coordinated Failure Handling:

  1. Log failure with full context (AISP evidence + Coherence witness)
  2. Update learning (AISP: aff -= 10, Coherence: adapt threshold)
  3. Isolate affected region (Coherence: MinCut if needed)
  4. Notify appropriate handler (based on lane)
  5. Record in witness chain for audit

Part 2: Module Architecture

Module A: aisp-coherence

Purpose: Bridge AISP spec-time artifacts to Coherence run-time substrate

A.1 Signal Integration

AISP Provides:

  • Signal structure: V_H (768) ⊕ V_L (512) ⊕ V_S (256) = 1536 dimensions
  • Orthogonality guarantee: V_H ∩ V_S = ∅, V_L ∩ V_S = ∅
  • Lossless property: Signal can be decomposed and reconstructed

Coherence Uses:

  • Full 1536-dim as node state vector
  • Subspace-aware energy computation
  • Safety-weighted residuals (V_S weighted highest)

Integration Specification:

Signal Subspace Dimension Range Energy Weight Rationale
V_H (Semantic) 0-767 0.25 Meaning similarity
V_L (Structural) 768-1279 0.25 Topology alignment
V_S (Safety) 1280-1535 0.50 Orthogonal = unforgeable

Safety Gate Rule:

  • Any non-zero V_S residual indicates genuine safety constraint violation
  • V_S violations cannot be masked by V_H/V_L similarity (orthogonality)
  • V_S residual > critical_threshold → immediate block regardless of other factors

A.2 Pocket Integration

AISP Provides:

  • Pocket structure: 𝒫 = ⟨ℋ, ℳ, 𝒩⟩
  • Immutability physics: ∂𝒩 ⇒ ∂ℋ.id, ∂ℳ ⇏ ∂ℋ.id
  • CAS addressing: ℋ.id = SHA256(𝒩)

Coherence Uses:

  • Pocket as SheafNode (not converted — IS the node)
  • Membrane affinity as edge weight source
  • Nucleus hash for integrity verification

Integration Specification:

Pocket Part Mutability Coherence Mapping Sync Behavior
ℋ.id Immutable NodeId One-time at deploy
ℋ.V Immutable Node state One-time at deploy
ℋ.f Immutable Node metadata One-time at deploy
ℳ.aff Mutable Edge weights Continuous sync
ℳ.conf Mutable Reliability weight Continuous sync
ℳ.use Mutable Activity tracking Continuous sync
𝒩 Immutable Constraint reference Reference only

Membrane → Edge Sync Rules:

  1. For each (target, affinity) in ℳ.aff:
    • If affinity < τ_v: remove edge if exists
    • If affinity ≥ τ_v: upsert edge with weight = sigmoid(affinity × 0.1)
  2. Sync on every membrane change
  3. Edge removal is lazy (mark, don't delete immediately)

A.3 Search Integration

AISP Provides:

  • Intelligence Engine: ⊞ (scan), ψ_g (ghost), Run (beam search)
  • RossNet scoring: μ_f = σ(θ₁·sim_H + θ₂·fit_L + θ₃·aff_M)
  • Risk scoring: μ_r = Σ r(x) + λ_r·|p|
  • Viability check: viable(b) ⇔ |⊞(ψ_g(b))| > 0

Coherence Adds:

  • Energy-based candidate filtering
  • Coherence term in fitness
  • Path energy in risk
  • Structural gap detection in ghost

Integration Specification:

AISP Component Coherence Enhancement Combined Behavior
⊞ (scan) Filter by local energy Return only candidates with E < threshold
ψ_g (ghost) High-energy edges Ghost includes structural tensions
μ_f (fitness) Add θ₄·coh_E term coh_E = 1 - min(local_energy, 1)
μ_r (risk) Add λ_e·E(path) Path energy contributes to risk
viable(b) Check coherent path exists Must have low-energy route to goal
✂ (prune) Triple gate Prune if risk OR energy OR safety violated

Augmented Formulas:

  • Fitness: μ_f(x) = σ(θ₁·sim_H + θ₂·fit_L + θ₃·aff_M + θ₄·coh_E)
  • Risk: μ_r(p) = Σ r(x) + λ_r·|p| + λ_e·E(p)
  • Prune: μ_r(b) > τ OR E(b) > ε OR safety_violated(b) ⇒ ✂(b)

A.4 Binding Integration

AISP Provides:

  • Binding function: Δ⊗λ(A, B) → {0, 1, 2, 3}
  • Binding semantics:
    • 0 (Crash): Logic(A) ∩ Logic(B) ⇒ ⊥
    • 1 (Null): Sock(A) ∩ Sock(B) = ∅
    • 2 (Adapt): Type(A) ≠ Type(B)
    • 3 (Zero): Post(A) ⊆ Pre(B)
  • DCE optimization: Δ⊗λ = 3 ⇒ Strip(B.checks)

Coherence Uses:

  • Binding state determines edge existence and weight
  • Binding semantics determine restriction map
  • Binding state determines residual interpretation

Integration Specification:

Binding Edge Weight ρ Derivation Residual Meaning
Crash (0) None Do not compute
Null (1) Create 0.3 Project to Sock(A) ∩ Sock(B) Socket alignment
Adapt (2) Create 0.6 Learn from successful adaptations Transformation accuracy
Zero (3) Create 1.0 Identity (no transformation) Contract compliance

Restriction Map Derivation:

  • Zero: ρ = I (identity matrix, same dimension)
  • Adapt: ρ = learned via GNN from (Post(A), Pre(B)) pairs
  • Null: ρ = projection matrix to common socket interface
  • Crash: no ρ (no edge)

A.5 Learning Integration

AISP Provides:

  • Hebbian updates: ⊕ → aff += 1, ⊖ → aff -= 10
  • Confidence dynamics: ⊕ → conf up, ⊖ → conf down
  • Skip threshold: aff < τ_v ⇒ skip
  • Eviction: Age > τ_s ∧ use = 0 ⇒ evict

Coherence Provides:

  • SONA: Instant (<0.05ms), Background (async), Consolidation (periodic)
  • ReasoningBank: Pattern storage and retrieval
  • EWC++: Anti-forgetting during adaptation

Integration Specification:

Outcome AISP Coherence Cross-System
Success aff += 1, conf += α instant_confirm(E) Store if E < 0.1
Failure aff -= 10, conf -= β instant_adapt(E) Lower scope threshold if E > 0.5
Skip triggered Mark skip Log skip reason
Eviction check Age > 90d ∧ use = 0 E > threshold ∧ conf < 0.3 Either triggers eviction
Consolidation EWC++ Sync conf to edge weights

Unified Skip Decision Flow:

  1. AISP check: Is aff[source, target] < τ_v?
  2. Pattern check: Does ReasoningBank show repeated failures?
  3. Energy check: Is edge energy > retrieval threshold?
  4. Decision: Skip if (1) OR (2) OR (3)

A.6 Evidence Integration

AISP Provides:

  • ⟦Ε⟧ block with δ, φ, τ, ⊢
  • Compile-time quality attestation
  • Formal proof references

Coherence Provides:

  • WitnessRecord with energy, decision, lane
  • Run-time consistency attestation
  • Hash-chained audit trail

Integration Specification:

Source Field Type Purpose
AISP spec_delta f32 Density at compile
AISP spec_phi u8 Completeness 0-100
AISP spec_tier Tier Quality classification
AISP spec_proofs Vec Formal proof claims
AISP spec_hash Hash Spec content hash
Coherence coherence_energy f32 Energy at decision
Coherence subspace_energy SubspaceEnergy Breakdown by V_H/V_L/V_S
Coherence gate_decision GateDecision Allow/deny/escalate
Coherence compute_lane Lane Resource level
Coherence previous_witness Option Chain link
Both binding_state Option<Δ⊗λ> If coordination
Both timestamp Timestamp Decision time
Both content_hash Hash Record integrity

Chain Integrity:

  • Each witness includes hash of previous
  • Chain is append-only
  • Verification: walk chain, verify each hash
  • Break in chain = tampering detected

Module B: claude-flow-coherence

Purpose: Execute Claude-Flow agents with AISP spec validation and Coherence gating

B.1 Agent Definition

Core Principle: An agent IS a Pocket, not a wrapper

Agent Aspect Pocket Mapping
Agent ID ℋ.id (content-addressed)
Capabilities 𝒩.def (AISP specification)
Learned state ℳ (Membrane)
Embedding ℋ.V (Signal)
Executable 𝒩.wa (WASM) or 𝒩.ir (LLVM)

Agent Creation Flow:

  1. Write agent capabilities as AISP specification
  2. Validate specification (require tier ≥ ◊)
  3. Package as Pocket with Signal embedding
  4. Register Pocket in Coherence substrate
  5. Create Claude-Flow agent referencing Pocket

B.2 Task Execution

Pre-Execution Checklist:

Check Owner Failure Action
Task spec tier ≥ Silver AISP Reject task
Binding Δ⊗λ ≠ 0 AISP Reject incompatible
Coherence energy < threshold Coherence Escalate lane
Skip not triggered Both Skip task
Safety gate clear Coherence Block if V_S violated

Execution Flow:

  1. Receive task (may be AISP-specified or natural language)
  2. If AISP spec: validate tier (require ≥ Silver)
  3. If agent-task pair: check binding Δ⊗λ
  4. Compute coherence energy for task scope
  5. Combine tier + energy → determine lane
  6. Check skip conditions (affinity + patterns + energy)
  7. If all pass: execute
  8. Record outcome (AISP Hebbian + Coherence SONA)
  9. Create unified witness
  10. Return result with witness ID

Lane Determination:

AISP Tier Base Lane Energy Override
◊⁺⁺ Reflex If E ≥ ε₁ → Retrieval+
◊⁺ Reflex/Retrieval If E ≥ ε₁ → Heavy+
Retrieval If E ≥ ε₂ → Human
◊⁻ Heavy If E ≥ ε₂ → Human
Human Always Human

Final lane = max(tier_lane, energy_lane)


B.3 Orchestration

Agent Selection via AISP Search:

  1. Convert task to Intent (embed as Signal query)
  2. Run AISP Intelligence Engine with Coherence augmentation
  3. Return best-fit agent Pocket
  4. Map Pocket to Claude-Flow agent

Multi-Agent Coordination:

  1. Check binding compatibility between agents: Δ⊗λ
  2. Create/verify edges in Coherence graph
  3. Sequence based on binding state (Zero first, Adapt second, Null last)
  4. Monitor coordination energy during handoffs
  5. Update affinities based on coordination success

Orchestration Witness:

  • Created for every coordination decision
  • Contains: agents involved, binding states, energies, outcome
  • Hash-chained with execution witnesses
  • Enables full replay of coordination sequence

B.4 State Management

Bidirectional Sync:

Direction What Syncs Trigger
Claude-Flow → Coherence Agent status, assignments State change
Claude-Flow → Coherence Task dependencies Task creation
Coherence → Claude-Flow Energy-based warnings Threshold crossed
Both directions Outcome results Execution complete

State Mapping:

Claude-Flow State Coherence Equivalent
Agent active Node in graph
Agent idle Node with low activity weight
Task pending Node awaiting edges
Task assigned Edge to agent
Dependency Edge between tasks

Part 3: Feature Mapping Tables

Complete AISP Feature Mapping

AISP Feature Category Coherence Integration Phase
Signal V_H (768) 𝕃₀ Semantic energy component Deploy, Execute
Signal V_L (512) 𝕃₀ Structural energy component Deploy, Execute
Signal V_S (256) 𝕃₀ Safety energy (2x weight) Deploy, Execute
Orthogonality guarantee 𝕃₀ Unforgeable safety Execute
Pocket 𝒫 𝕃₁ SheafNode Deploy
Header ℋ 𝕃₁ Node identity + state Deploy
Membrane ℳ 𝕃₁ Edge weights (continuous sync) Execute, Learn
Nucleus 𝒩 𝕃₁ Constraint reference Deploy
CAS addressing 𝕃₁ Integrity verification Deploy
Scan ⊞ 𝕃₂ Energy-filtered search Execute
Ghost ψ_g 𝕃₂ + high-energy edges Execute
RossNet μ_f 𝕃₂ + θ₄·coh_E Execute
Risk μ_r 𝕃₂ + λ_e·E(path) Execute
Beam search 𝕃₂ Triple-gate pruning Execute
Hebbian aff±{1,-10} Learning SONA coordination Learn
Confidence dynamics Learning Reliability weighting Learn
Skip threshold τ_v Learning Multi-source decision Execute, Learn
Eviction policy Learning + energy-based Learn
Binding Δ⊗λ=0 Binding No edge Coordinate
Binding Δ⊗λ=1 Binding Weak edge, projection ρ Coordinate
Binding Δ⊗λ=2 Binding Medium edge, learned ρ Coordinate
Binding Δ⊗λ=3 Binding Strong edge, identity ρ Coordinate
DCE optimization Binding Skip redundant checks Execute
Functor 𝔽 Category Validation preservation All
Functor 𝔾 Category Signal extraction Deploy
Adjunction ⊞⊣embed Category Coherence-ranked results Execute
Evidence ⟦Ε⟧ Audit Unified witness Audit
Density δ Quality Unified quality Compile, Audit
Tier τ Quality Lane suggestion Execute

Complete Coherence Feature Mapping

Coherence Feature Category AISP Enhancement Phase
SheafNode Graph Pocket as node Deploy
SheafEdge Graph Binding determines structure Coordinate
RestrictionMap ρ Graph Binding determines derivation Coordinate
Residual r_e Compute Binding interprets meaning Execute
Energy E Compute Subspace weighting from Signal Execute
Incremental update Compute Membrane sync triggers Execute
Spectral analysis Compute Drift detection Execute
Lane 0 (Reflex) Gate Tier ◊⁺⁺/◊⁺ default Execute
Lane 1 (Retrieval) Gate Tier ◊ default Execute
Lane 2 (Heavy) Gate Tier ◊⁻ default Execute
Lane 3 (Human) Gate Tier ⊘ always Execute
SONA Instant Learning Hebbian coordination Learn
SONA Background Learning Pattern optimization Learn
SONA EWC++ Learning Anti-forgetting Learn
ReasoningBank Learning Cross-outcome patterns Learn
GNN restriction Learning Adapt binding maps Coordinate
WitnessRecord Governance + ⟦Ε⟧ fields Audit
Hash chain Governance Unified audit trail Audit
Policy bundle Governance Tier-aware thresholds Execute
Neural gating Advanced Hysteresis smoothing Execute
Hyperbolic energy Advanced Hierarchy awareness Execute
MinCut isolation Advanced Fault containment Fail

Part 4: The Synergy

What AISP Guarantees

"Agents will interpret this specification identically"

  • No telephone game distortion
  • Ambiguity < 0.02
  • Single-token semantics
  • Formal proof carrying

What Coherence Guarantees

"If reality diverges from expectation, we'll detect it"

  • No silent failures
  • Structural consistency verification
  • Continuous monitoring
  • Mathematical witnesses

Together

Unambiguous specs + Runtime consistency = Safe autonomous systems

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                        AISP LAYER                              │
│  Spec → Parse → Validate → δ score → ⟦Ε⟧ Evidence             │
│  "Is my instruction unambiguous?"                              │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                              ↓
                       Pocket deployed
                              ↓
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                     COHERENCE LAYER                            │
│  State → Residuals → Energy → Gate → Witness                   │
│  "Does execution still fit together?"                          │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                              ↓
                      Action or Refusal
                      (with full audit trail)

⟦Ε⟧⟨ δ≜0.91 φ≜100 τ≜◊⁺⁺ ⊢AISP:SpecTime:Ambiguity<0.02 ⊢Coherence:RunTime:Energy→Gate ⊢Integration:PhaseByPhase ⊢Synergy:UnambiguousSpecs+RuntimeConsistency ⊢ModuleA:aispCoherence ⊢ModuleB:claudeFlowCoherence ⊢Audit:UnifiedWitness+HashChain ⟩

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment