Hey — reviewed this against our full task landscape. The concept can work, but the framing needs to shift to pass the overlap gate. Here's why and how:
The problem with the current framing: As written, this reads as "deploy CloudNativePG + PgBouncer + WAL archiving + monitoring" — a greenfield build task. That overlaps heavily with the approved PostgreSQL HA + PgBouncer task (Patroni), which covers the same flow with a different tool. "Different tool, same operation" is a tough sell when we have 15+ PostgreSQL tasks.
The angle that makes this distinct: What no existing task covers is live infrastructure migration — the planned, zero-downtime migration of running production databases from one management paradigm to another. That's the genuinely novel core of your idea, and it tests skills that none of the existing PG tasks touch: migration planning, cutover orchestration under live traffic, data consistency across the migration window, rollback strategy, and decommissioning old infrastructure.